Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 261--265

In vivo study of bovine hydroxyapatite-gelatin-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose with alendronate as injectable bone substitute composite in osteoporotic animal model


Aniek Setiya Budiatin, Maria Apriliani Gani, Bulan Rhea Kaulika Hadinar Putri, Samirah Samirah, Dyah Hikmawati, Alfian Pramudita Putra, Nily Su'aidah, Junaidi Khotib 
 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Aniek Setiya Budiatin
Perum Griya Airlangga, D 17 Wonorejo Selatan, Rungkut, Surabaya
Indonesia

Abstract

The injectable bone substitute (IBS) is a self-setting local drug delivery system that adjusts the shape of the bone gap in the fracture. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of IBS composites of bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA) and alendronate (Ale) in accelerating bone growth in osteoporotic rats. IBS was made by mixing BHA with gelatin 5%, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) 2%, and Ale 10%. The physical properties of IBS were viscosity, injectability, and density tests. Twenty-four female Wistar rats were divided into four groups. After 8 weeks, 2 mm gap was made in the right femur of all rats and filled with IBS. The healing process was observed after 6 weeks with X-ray imaging and H and E staining. The obtained results showed viscosity, injectability, and density value of IBS from 30.4 to 39.4 dPa.s, 98.22%–98.64%, and 0.6325–0.8409 g/cm3, respectively. X-ray imaging and histology results proved the condition of osteoporosis in rats with ovariectomy. The addition of BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale significantly affected the number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts (P < 0.05). After 45 days of observation, the addition of BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale showed the highest mean number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts, which were 25.00 ± 3.00, 64.33 ± 11.15, and 5.67 ± 0.58 compared to BHA-Gel-HPMC and positive control groups. The BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale IBS has the potential to reverse osteoporosis. Nevertheless, the underlying potential of these biomaterials to reverse osteoporosis needs further research.



How to cite this article:
Budiatin AS, Gani MA, Putri BR, Samirah S, Hikmawati D, Putra AP, Su'aidah N, Khotib J. In vivo study of bovine hydroxyapatite-gelatin-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose with alendronate as injectable bone substitute composite in osteoporotic animal model.J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022;13:261-265


How to cite this URL:
Budiatin AS, Gani MA, Putri BR, Samirah S, Hikmawati D, Putra AP, Su'aidah N, Khotib J. In vivo study of bovine hydroxyapatite-gelatin-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose with alendronate as injectable bone substitute composite in osteoporotic animal model. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 28 ];13:261-265
Available from: https://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2022/13/4/261/358209


Full Text



 Introduction



Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by a gradual decrease in bone density (T-score ≤−2.5) and the damage to the bone tissue microarchitecture, resulting in an increase in bone fragility and the risk of fractures or large fractures gap formation. Osteoporosis occurs due to an imbalance between osteoclast and osteoblast activity, making the resorption process higher than the bone formation process. Data from the International Osteoporosis Foundation in 2015 stated that 1 in 3 women and 1 in 5 men experienced an osteoporosis-related fracture at 50 years worldwide.[1],[2],[3]

The injectable bone substitute (IBS) is a local drug delivery system that adapts the shape of the bone gap to fracture, a minimally invasive treatment method, and an alternative route for delivery of high drug concentration.[4],[5] The injectable system was aimed at the bone gap due to osteoporotic cases, which contained inorganic and organic components that resemble the structure of the bone matrix.[6],[7]

Alendronate (Ale) is a bisphosphonate drug used to prevent and treat osteoporosis. There are two mechanisms of Ale acting as an inhibitor of the farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase enzyme. This enzyme increases osteoclast activity and binds to calcium from bone hydroxyapatite. As a result, osteoclast activity for bone resorption decreased.[8] In oral use, Ale has low bioavailability (1%–5%). In addition, it also causes side effects, such as gastrointestinal disorders and osteonecrosis of the facial jaw, if consumed for a long time.[3],[7],[9]

Delivery of Ale in the bone tissue can be supported by bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA). BHA is hydroxyapatite from bovine bone, which has chemical and physical properties similar to human bone. Besides, gelatin (Gel) is a polymer that resembles an organic component of bone tissue. BHA and Gel help accelerate bone growth in damaged bone tissue.[7] In addition, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is an inert, viscoelastic polymer used for controlled delivery.[7],[10] BHA-Gel-HPMC composite could be an excellent delivery system for Ale in the bone tissue.

This study aimed to examine the BHA-Gel-HPMC IBS composite in osteoporotic bone tissue engineering as a filler to strengthen bone mechanical properties and Ale delivery system.

 Materials and Methods



Synthesis dan characterization of injectable bone substitute

The IBS was synthesized by dissolving Gel powder 5% into distilled water at 40°C for 1 h. BHA was added to the Gel solution with a ratio of 45:55 and stirred for 1 h. Then, Ale was mixed with the BHA-Gel solution with the composition of 10% from the mass of BHA in each sample and stirred until homogeneous. HPMC 2% (w/v) was dissolved with distilled water at 90°C until the temperature decreased to 40°C. The HPMC solution was poured into the BHA-Gel-Ale mixture at 40°C and stirred for 6 h. The physical characterization was carried out by using a viscometer.

The injectability test was carried out by inserting the suspension into a 10 ml syringe with an inside diameter of 2 mm and a 1.2 mm inner diameter syringe needle within 2 min with variations of temperature: 15°C, 25°C, 35°C, and 45°C. The setting time test was carried out by injecting IBS into the HA substrate, then observing the setting process that occurred. The injected suspension in the HA substrate was conducted at 25°C close to room temperature and 35°C close to body temperature.

In vivo test

200–250 g 3 months old Wistar rat (Rattus norvegicus) were used in the experiments. This research has been approved by the Ethical Committee in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Airlangga University, Indonesia, with reference number 2.KE.075.05.2018. After an adaptation period of 1 week, 24 rats were randomly divided into four groups: control negative group (healthy group, P1), control positive group (P2), BHA-Gel-HPMC Group (P3), and BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale (P4). The positive control group underwent ovariectomy without bone filler. After 8 weeks, the pre-surgery treatment was performed by anesthetizing the rat with ketamine (25 mg/kg) and xylazine (8 mg/kg) I. M in the left leg.[11] The incision in the abdomen was performed through linea alba. The ovarium was removed, and the open abdomen was sutured. The osteoporosis took place after 8 weeks.

After 8 weeks of ovariectomy, the treatment of bone filler was performed by anesthetizing the rat.[11] The fracture was made on the rat's femur in the lengthwise direction and incision was performed in the femur until the bone. The drilling on the bone was performed to make a hole with a diameter of 2 mm. The IBS was then injected into the hole, and the opened skin was sutured.

Histopathology

After 6 weeks of bone filler injection, the rats were terminated by using ether anesthesia. The femur bone was stored in the 10% BNF. Bone decalcification was performed in 10% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution. The bone cell observation was observed with H and E (HE) staining, and the bone gap was observed radiologically. The bone cell observation included osteoblast, osteoclast, and osteocytes. They were observed under a light microscope with a magnification of 400 times.

Statistical analysis

Results obtained are showed as mean ± standard deviation. Independent sample t-test was used to evaluate the difference between control positive and negative group. One way analysis of variance was to analyze osteoblast, osteoclast, and osteocytes scoring. P < 0.05 was stated statistically significant differences.

 Results and Discussion



Injectable bone substitute characteristics

The viscosity test was carried out to determine the thickness of the suspension synthesized as a function of temperature and ensure the viscosity of the HPMC suspension viscosity standard value of 2% (w/v) as a bone substitute application, which is 40 dPa.s.[7] The IBS viscosity test results obtained viscosity between 30.4 and 39.4 dPa.s. The viscosity of IBS and the temperature of IBS greatly affected by injectability.[5] The percentage of injectability is between 98.22% and 98.64% at 25° C–35°C was able to set and increased the substrate density from 0.6325 g/cm3 to 0.8409 g/cm3 according to normal bone density. The physical properties of IBS allowed IBS BHA-Gel-HPMC to be applied to treat osteoporosis.

Anatomical pathology test results

The results of X-ray imaging on the rat's femur after 6 weeks in the P1, P2, P3, and P4 groups are shown in [Figure 1]. The gap size was calculated using ImageJ v1.44p software, as shown in [Table 1]. The results showed that osteoporosis had occurred in positive control. In addition, the results of the analysis of P2 showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the bone gap size compared to P1 [Table 1]. Ovariectomy has been shown to cause osteoporosis. The ovariectomy triggers excessive osteoclast activity, which causes an imbalance of bone remodeling, promoting bone resorption and decreasing bone regeneration.[12] Osteoporosis-related estrogen deficiency suppressed the osteocyte life sustainability and disrupted the physiological response of osteoblasts for mechanical stimulation, damage detection, and bone repair.[13]{Figure 1}{Table 1}

Moreover, as shown in [Table 2], the positive control groups P3 and P4 were not significantly different (P > 0.05) in compare to P2. Ale concentration 10% in BHA-Gel-HPMC used was less than optimal for the balance of bone formation, and the lack of observation time affects the number of cell growth. Ale would suppress osteoclast activity excessively which made bone remodeling suppressed and decrease the bone formation and caused a delay in bone grafting.[14],[15] The observation's times played a vital role in assessing the effectiveness of Ale. Based on the remodeling process, bone takes 3–4 months or years to complete the fully regenerated bone structure.[16],[17],[18]{Table 2}

Observation of bone cell growth was also carried out for the femoral gap through a histopathological test with HE staining. The cells observed included osteoblast, osteocyte, and osteoclast with a magnification of × 400. The results are shown in [Figure 2], and the mean numbers of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts between treatment groups are shown in [Table 3]. HE staining results showed the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in P2 significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to P1. The average number of osteoblasts in P2 is 14.33 ± 2.52, while the average number of osteoblasts in P1 is 9.00 ± 1.73 and the average number of osteoclasts in P2 is 10.00 ± 2.00. The number of osteocytes in the P2 was not significantly different (P > 0.05) compared to P1. Based on the result of the independent t-test in P2, the addition of BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale (P4) significantly affected the number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts (P < 0.05). After 45 days of observation, the addition of BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale (P4) showed the highest average number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts 25.00 ± 3.00, 64.33 ± 11.15, and 5.67 ± 0.58, respectively, in compared to P3 and P1.{Figure 2}{Table 3}

The result showed that the number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts in group BHA-Gel-HPMC with Ale (P4) showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in compared to P2 and P3. This study showed the same results as the research conducted by Toker et al. After 8 weeks, they evaluated the local effect of Ale and calcium phosphate combination on calvarial bone defects in rats.[19] The results showed no significant difference between the two groups (P3 and P4) on the number of osteoblasts or osteoclasts. This result showed that the bone formation process was still happening. When injected into the bone gap, Ale binds to BHA form a very strong bond, while Ale distributed in the Gel-HPMC released and binds to the calcium hydroxyapatite of the bone around the gap. It caused the bone around the gap became solid and hard. Gel-HPMC interacted with osteoblasts to form osteoid. Osteoid turn into osteocytes with bone calcium and calcium from BHA.[7],[20],[21]

 Conclusions



The results of physical characteristics test showed that BHA-Gel-HPMC-Ale has potential as treatment for osteoporosis. Moreover, X-ray imaging and histopathological tests proved that ovariectomy in Wistar rat resulted in an osteoporosis model. The IBS combination did not accelerate narrowing the bone gap based on the results of X-ray imaging. The results of HE staining showed that the injectable BHA-Gel-HPMC increased the number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts in ovariectomy rat models. The addition of Ale did not increase the number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts within 6 weeks of observation in compared to BHA-Gel-HPMC. It is recommend to observe more than 6 weeks to prove the addition of Ale in accelerating of bone growth.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Research under the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (RISTEKDIKTI RI).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Oei L, Koromani F, Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, Oei EH. Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016;6:680-98.
2Khotib J, Gani MA, Budiatin AS, Lestari ML, Rahadiansyah E, Ardianto C. Signaling pathway and transcriptional regulation in osteoblasts during bone healing: Direct involvement of hydroxyapatite as a biomaterial. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021;14:615.
3Gani MA, Nurhan AD, Budiatin AS, Siswodihardjo S, Khotib J. Predicting the molecular mechanism of glucosamine in accelerating bone defect repair by stimulating osteogenic proteins. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2021;32:373-7.
4Capra P, Dorati R, Colonna C, Bruni G, Pavanetto F, Genta I, et al. A preliminary study on the morphological and release properties of hydroxyapatite-alendronate composite materials. J Microencapsul 2011;28:395-405.
5Hikmawati D, Maulida HN, Putra AP, Budiatin AS, Syahrom A. Synthesis and characterization of nanohydroxyapatite-gelatin composite with streptomycin as antituberculosis injectable bone substitute. Int J Biomater 2019;2019:7179243.
6Tran RT, Gyawali D, Nair P, Yang J. Biodegradable Injectable Systems for Bone Tissue Engineering, a Handbook of Applied Biopolymer Technology: Synthesis, Degradation and Applications. Royal Society of Chemistry No. 12; 2013. p. 419-51.
7Budiatin AS, Gani MA, Ardianto C, Samirah, Pattah SY, Mubarokah F, et al. The impact of glutaraldehyde on the characteristics of bovine hydroxyapatite-gelatin based bone scaffold as gentamicin delivery system. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2021;32:687-91.
8Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: Mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:1032-45.
9Bourges X, Weiss P, Daculsi G, Legeay G. Synthesis and general properties of silated-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in prospect of biomedical use. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2002;99:215-28.
10Putra AP, Faradisa I, Hikmawati D, Siswanto. The Effect of Hydroxyapatite-Gelatin Composite with Alendronate as Injectable Bone Substitute on Various Hydroxyapatite-Based Substrate 2019 International Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Conference. IBITeC; 2019. p. 41-5.
11Kilic N, Henke J, Pragst I, Erhardt W. Comparison of three different medetomidine/ketamine combinations in NMRI mice. Vet Anaesth Analg 2001;28:211-2.
12Syafikriatillah AR, Darwis D, Abbas B, Maheshwari H, Erwin E, Noviana D. White Blood Profile of Sprague Dawley RatPost-Implantation of DFDBX Bone Marking and Nata De Coco Membrane in Calvary Bone Defect. Prosiding KIVNAS ke-14, ICEBSD City, Tangerang 22-25 September, 2016. p. 10-1.
13Erpek S, Kılıç N, Kozacı LD, Dikicioğlu E. Effects of flunixin meglumine, diclofenac sodium and metamizole sodium on experimental wound healing in rats. Rev Med Vet 2006;157:185-92.
14Wada T, Nakashima T, Hiroshi N, Penninger JM. RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol Med 2006;12:17-25.
15Rodriguez EK, Zurakowski D, Herder L, Hall A, Walley KC, Weaver MJ, et al. Mechanical construct characteristics predisposing to non-union after locked lateral plating of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:403-8.
16Sloan AV, Martin JR, Li S, Li J. Parathyroid hormone and bisphosphonate have opposite effects on stress fracture repair. Bone 2010;47:235-40.
17Park SB, Lee YJ, Chung CK. Bone mineral density changes after ovariectomy in rats as an osteopenic model: Stepwise description of double dorso-lateral approach. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;48:309-12.
18O'connel MB, Seaton TL. Osteoporosis and osteomalacia. In: Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, editors. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. 6th ed., Ch. 88. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005. p. 1645-66.
19Toker H, Ozdemir H, Ozer H, Eren K. Alendronate enhances osseous healing in a rat calvarial defect model. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:1545-50.
20Barrere F, van BC, de GK, Layrolle P. Nucleation of biomimetic Ca-P coatings on ti6A14V from a SBFx5 solution: Influence of magnesium. Biomaterials 2002;23:2211-20.
21Budiatin AS, Gani MA, Samirah, Ardianto C, Raharjanti AM, Septiani I, et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite-based bone scaffold with gentamicin accelerates vascularization and remodeling of bone defect. Int J Biomater 2021;2021:5560891.