| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 12
| Issue : 4 | Page : 321-326 |
|
|
Comparison of various synthesis methods and synthesis parameters of pyrazoline derivates
Meilinda Setya Praceka1, Sandra Megantara1, Rani Maharani2, Muchtaridi Muchtaridi1
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, 45363, Jatinangor, West Java, Indonesia
2 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia
Correspondence Address:
Prof. Muchtaridi Muchtaridi
Ph.D,Jl. Bandung, Sumedang Km. 21, Jatinangor, 45363
Indonesia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_252_21
|
|
|
Pyrazoline plays an important role in the development of heterocyclic chemistry theory and is widely used as a synthesis useful in organic synthesis. The structure of the pyrazoline derivative compound contains a 5-membered heterocyclic framework with two nitrogen atoms and one endocyclic double bond. The function of pyrazoline as a fragment was stable enough in the bioactive group to synthesize new compounds with various biological activities. Various methods that could be used for the synthesis of pyrazole derivatives were ultrasonic irradiation, microwave assistance, ionic liquids, grinding techniques, and conventional methods. However, the synthesis of pyrazoline derivatives using conventional methods had many problems, one of which is the product yield, which was <70%. Therefore, this article will discuss the importance of optimizing the synthesis reaction conditions by taking into account several synthesis parameters to get the best organic product results based on conventional methods. A literature search was conducted by employing PubChem, Chemspider Google Scholar, Research Gate, Science Direct, and Elsevier by selecting pyrazoline synthesis based on physicochemical profile, reaction mechanism, and synthesis method.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
