Home  |  About JAPTR |  Editorial board  |  Search |  Ahead of print  |  Current issue  |  Archives |  Submit article  |  Instructions  |  Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |Login 
Users Online: 970   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
     

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 61-66  

Evaluation of the stability and antibacterial activity of crude extracts of hydro-endophytic fungi


1 Department of Thai Traditional Medicine, Thai Traditional Medicine College, Rajamangala University of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medical Technology, Nation University, Lampang, Thailand

Date of Submission15-Aug-2020
Date of Decision03-Sep-2020
Date of Acceptance19-Sep-2020
Date of Web Publication09-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Surachai Techaoei
Thai Traditional Medicine College, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Pathumthani 12130
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_114_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The production and screening of secondary metabolites of four hydro-endophytes isolated from lotus, and the stability of bioactive compounds was evaluated. Surface-sterilized technique was used to isolate the endophytic fungi (EF) on potato dextrose agar and identified by using morphological and molecular techniques. The extracts were tested for anti-microbial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DMST20651, Streptococcus mutans (SM) DMST18777, Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) ATCC12228, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) TISTR1467, and Propionibacterium acnes (PN) DMST14916. The bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities were determined. Finally, thermal and ultraviolet (UV) stability was evaluated. Four endophyte isolates (EF 14, EF36, EF53, EF58, and EF60) produced secondary metabolites and showed activity against MRSA, SM, SE, PA, and PN, respectively. The crude ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and methanol (MeOH) extract of EF14 showed activity against MRSA with the inhibition zone of 9.00 ± 0.00 and 7.50 ± 0.50 mm, and minimum inhibitory concentration was 4.80 and 4.90 mg/mL, respectively. The minimum bactericidal concentration was 9.60 mg/mL. Whereas, the crude EtOAc and MeOH extract EF60, which were extracted by EtOAc and MeOH, showed inhibition zone of SE as 12.33 ± 0.57 and 12.33 ± 0.57 mm, respectively. Crude EtOAC extracts of EF14 showed highest thermal stability at 55°C–121°C, and UV stability with MRSA and SE, respectively. The results showed that the EtOAc extracts of EF could be potential antibacterial pathogens and displayed UV-thermal stability. This information is beneficial for future investigations, since some bioactive compounds have potential as anti-resistant strains of some bacterial pathogens.

Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, bioactive compound, hydro-endophytic fungi


How to cite this article:
Techaoei S, Jarmkom K, Dumrongphuttidecha T, Khobjai W. Evaluation of the stability and antibacterial activity of crude extracts of hydro-endophytic fungi. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2021;12:61-6

How to cite this URL:
Techaoei S, Jarmkom K, Dumrongphuttidecha T, Khobjai W. Evaluation of the stability and antibacterial activity of crude extracts of hydro-endophytic fungi. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 21];12:61-6. Available from: https://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2021/12/1/61/306557




  Introduction Top


The fungal endophytic fungi (EF) are normally found in the intracellular tissue of plants. They have been reported as the producers of important biologically bioactive molecules.[1] In general, EF originates in plant tissues without eliciting disease symptoms, and consequently forms a symbiotic relationship. They can produce bioactive molecules for defense against pathogens. In addition, its bioactive molecules were applied for new drug development processes,[2],[3],[4] including antifungal, antiviral, anti-malarial, anticancer,[5],[6] and especially antibacterial pathogens.[7] However, the EF contained in different plants may have different biosynthetic properties, leads to the production of special bioactive compounds with varied biological activities. Many EF colonize inside hydro-plants, which frequently possess unique morphological and physiological properties. These appearances are probably responsible for hydro-plants' specific natural atmosphere for the growth of potential extraordinary endophytes.[8]

Therefore, in this research, we report the characterization of lotus endophytes and stability tests of bioactive compounds. In addition, antibacterial activities from solvent extracts and isolate of EF submerged culture were also investigated.


  Materials and Methods Top


Plants collection

Healthy plants Bua Khao Mongkol, Bua Chalong Khuan, Bua Luang, and Bua Chompoo Mamaew were collected from Rajamangala University Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, Thailand. The identity of the hydro-plant specimens was confirmed by a specialist from the Lotus museum at Rajamangala University Thanyaburi.

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Plant samples were placed in sterile plastic bags for storage at the room temperature. All part of plants, including leaves, vein, inter vein, petal, stems, stolon, and roots were surface sterilized.[9] The tissue segments were allowed to air-dry before placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with ampicillin 200 mg/L in sterile culture plates and sealed with parafilm, incubated at the room temperature for 5 days. Fungal colonies tips were transferred aseptically to new PDA. The diversity analysis was conducted based on both colonization and isolation rate.[10]

Mycelial growth rate

The mycelial of endophytes was cut from colonies and grown in PDA, incubated at 30°C for 7 days. The mycelial diameter was measured daily.[11]

Screening of bioactive molecules

EF was cultivated on potato dextrose broth (PDB) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated at the room temperature for 2 weeks at 150 rpm. After fermentation, the fungus was filtered by filtrate paper (Whatman No. 1) and tested for antibacterial activities against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus mutans (SM), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Propionibacterium acnes (PN), respectively. After incubation for 24 h, the inhibition zone was measured. Erythromycin (15 μg/disc) and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used as controls.

Identification of endophytic fungi

The morphological characteristics, macroscopic and microscopic were determined. For genotypic identification, the DNA sequence of the ITS, SSU, and LSU region of the mRNA gene were analyzed. The fungal DNA was extracted using previously reported protocols. The ITS segment of genomic DNA was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a pair of universal primers, ITS1 (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). Purification and sequencing of PCR products were carried out by Macrogen Inc. (Rep. of Korea). The sequences have been deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) searches.[12],[13],[14]

The fermentation of endophytic fungi

The selected EF were tested for anti-bacterial activity by paper disc-diffusion assay.[15] Initial culture was prepared in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks by adding 5 plugs of growing mycelia cultured in 50 mL PDB, incubated at the room temperature under continuous shaking at 150 rpm for 2 weeks and scale up to 500 mL as the same conditions. Finally, fungal fermentation was filtered.[16]

The extraction of bioactive molecules of endophytes

The fungal supernatant was extracted by sequential extraction procedure using hexane, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and MeOH. Each solvent extraction was done in the ratio of 1:25 (v/v) and evaporated under reduced pressure at 45°C.[16]

Bacteriostatic and bactericidal determination

The broth micro-dilution technique was used to determine the bacteriostatic activity. Two-fold dilutions of fungal extracts were added directly in a test-tube containing nutrient broth to obtain difference concentrations. The starter was added to get a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL in each tube and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value was considered as the lowest concentration of the extracts that completely inhibits the bacterial growth. Erythromycin (10 μg/disc) and 10% DMSO were used as controls. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined from the MIC result by transferred into a fresh medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The lowest concentration of fungal crude extract that showed no visible growth of bacterial pathogen was considered the MBC value.[17]

The stability of cured extracts of fungal endophytes

The suitable MIC concentration of crude extracts was used to determine the various temperature and then tested for antibacterial activity. Two milliliters of crude extracts were added to test tubes, which were then heated in water bath for 15 min at varying temperatures: 55°C, 70°C, and 12°C. For ultraviolet (UV) stability, the extracts were exposed to UV radiation for 15 min. After the designated incubation period, the antibacterial activity was evaluated.[17]


  Results and Discussion Top


Isolation of endophytic fungi

Seventy distinct EFs were isolated in this study. The petal fragments of BKM analyzed showing the highest percentage colonization rate (80%), while vein and stem fragments of BL were 60% [Table 1]. The result showed that EF were more prevalent in the leaves of BL than other parts of the lotus. Similar results were obtained from previous reports, which found that eight from twenty fungal endophytes were obtained from Nymphaea nouchali.[18] All fungal isolates were screened to test anti-bacterial activity.
Table 1: The percentage of colonization rate and isolation rate of endophytic fungi with different part of lotus

Click here to view


Screening of bioactive molecules

The supernatant of all EF were tested for their antibacterial activity against MRSA, SM, SE, PA, and PN. It was found that five of 70 EF were active against at least two bacterium tested [Table 2]. Interestingly, the supernatant from cell-free cultured of fungi were found to exhibit growth inhibitory activity against PN, SE and MRSA, but other bacterial strains were not inhibited.
Table 2: Antibacterial activity of supernatant of endophytic fungi

Click here to view


Mycelial growth rate determination

The average colony diameters of all five EF after 7 days incubation are shown in [Figure 1]. Radial growth of the colonies was more rapid in PDA agar plates on day 5. The growth rates of EF36 and EF60 were higher than EF14, EF53, and EF58 with diameter of 7.00 ± 0.00 and 7.33 ± 0.28 cm. This indicated that different fungal species have different growth rates under the same condition. Recent research has suggested that nutrition-rich media promotes abundant mycelial density and radial growth rate.[19]
Figure 1: The mycelial growth of endophytic fungi at room temperature for 7 days of different endophytic fungi: (a) (endophytic fungi 14), (b) (endophytic fungi 36), (c) (endophytic fungi 53), (d) (endophytic fungi 58), (e) (endophytic fungi 60)

Click here to view


Identification of endophytic fungi

This study successfully amplified the ITS gene by using ITS1 and ITS4 primer from the four isolated EF. The nucleotide sequences of the four isolated EF were BLAST on the NCBI database. Result found that EF from four isolates were matched to the ITS gene of the EF and showed >99% identical with formerly recorded microbial species in the NCBI Genbank, and therefore, their identities were confirmed [Table 3].
Table 3: Identities of ITS sequences of endophytic fungi with their closest GenBank sequences (according to BLAST searches)

Click here to view


Antibacterial activity of fungal crude extracts

The crude extracts from different solvents (hexane, EtoAc, and MeOH) were tested for antibacterial activity against MRSA and SE [Table 4] showed inhibitory activity on the tested bacteria in different crude extracts. It was shown that EtOAc crude extracts of EF14 displayed more potential against both bacterial pathogens MRSA and SE which gave the zone of inhibition of 9.00 ± 0.00 and 12.67 ± 0.57 mm, whereas methanol (MeOH) extracts showed weak inhibition against MRSA. In addition, the fraction of MeOH extract of EF14 showed active activity against SE at clearing zone of 10.00 ± 0.00 mm. For fungal isolate EF60, both crude extracts of EtOAc and MeOH showed best inhibition against MRSA with inhibition zone of 12.33 ± 0.57 mm.
Table 4: Anti-bacterial activity of crude extracts of endophytic fungi

Click here to view


Bacteriostatic and bactericidal

Fungal crude extracts with antibacterial activity were further examined for their MIC and MBC by the agar disc-diffusion assay[20] against MRSA [Table 5]. EtOAc and MeOH extracts of EF14 had MIC value of 4.80 and 4.90 mg/mL, respectively, though only EtOAc extracts displayed MBC at the concentration of 9.60 mg/mL. The MeOH extract of EF36 showed MIC value of 303.80 mg/mL. Our findings corroborated with previous results from Dos Santos et al.[21] that indicated the MIC value of MeOH and EtOAc extracts of EF isolated from Indigofera suffruticosa to be 1.56 and 0.39 mg/mL, respectively.
Table 5: The minimum inhibition concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of endophytic fungi

Click here to view


The stability of cured extracts of endophytic fungi

Investigating the thermal stability of EtOAc and MeOH extracts is essential to prevent thermal degradation of bioactive compounds. The thermal stability of the crude extracts was tested by immersing the samples in a water bath at different temperatures of 55 and 70°C and autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. The anti-bacterial activity of the EtOAc extract showed inhibition zone of MRSA with 10.00 ± 0.00 mm at all temperature conditions, whereas SE was 8.00 ± 0.00 mm. Regarding UV radiation stability, the antibacterial activity of the crude EtOAc extracts showed the higher inhibition zone against SE compared to MRSA of 8.67 ± 0.57 and 7.50 ± 0.50 mm, respectively. On the contrary, the EF60 expressed less activity compared to fungal strain EF14. Hence, there is justification in that the crude EtOAc extracts of EF14 is thermal stable and UV stable between 55°C and 121°C for 15 min, indicating that it was maintained the biological activity. The EF has been confirmed as a bioactive molecules sources of novel bioactive agents against various microbial pathogens, and the crude extract was stable at temperatures up to 80°C.[22]


  Conclusions Top


A total of 70 EF isolated from lotuses were screened for antibacterial activity. The results showed that EF from BL has the highest colonization rate. Three isolates from BL (EF14, EF36, and EF53), one isolate from BCK (EF58) and BKM (EF60) produced bioactive molecule against PA, SE, and MRSA and were also selected for further investigation. The EtAOc extracts of EF14 showed the best potential antibacterial activity against MRSA with MIC and MBC value of 4.8 and 9.6 mg/mL and showed thermal stability and UV stability at temperatures between 55°C and 121°C for 15 min of exposure. To our knowledge, lotus is one of the potential sources of EF that produces secondary metabolites. In future, the optimization and structure characterization of EtOAc crude extracts of fungal isolate EF14 will be conducted.

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the NRCT, Thailand. We would also thank RMUTT for all facilities and would also like to thank Dr. Natnaree Siriwon for proof-reading this article.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Strobel G, Daisy B. Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003;67:491-502.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Selim KA, El-Beih AA, AbdEI-Rahman TM, EI-Diwany AI. Biology of endophytic fungi. Curr Res Environ Appl Mycol 2012;2:33-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mitchell AM, Strobel GA, Hess WM, Vargas PN, Ezra D. Muscodor crispans, a novel endophyte from Anans ananassoides in the Bilivian Amazon. Fung Divers 2008;31:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Stadler M, Keller NP. Paradigm shifts in fungal secondary metabolite research. Mycol Res 2008;112:127-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Strobel GA. Endophytes as sources of bioactive products. Microbes Infect 2003;5:535-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nicoletti R, Fiorentino A. Plant bioactive metabolites and drugs produced by endophytic fungi of spermatophyta. Agricult 2015;5:918-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jadulco R, Brauers G, Edrada RA, Ebel R, Wray V, Sudarsono S, et al. New metabolites from sponge-derived fungi Curvularia lunata and Cladosporium herbarum. J Nat Prod 2002;65:730-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dissanayake RK, Ratnaweera PB, Williams DE, Wijayarathne CD, Wijesundera RLC, Andersen RJ, et al. Antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi of the Sri Lankan aquatic plant Nymphaea nouchali and chaetoglobosin A and C, produced by the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum. Mycology 2016;7:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Marcellano JP, Collanto AS, Fuentes RG. Antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from the bark of Cinnamomum mercadoi. Pharmacogn J 2017;9:405-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Se-Al RA. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. Oxford OX1 4JD UK; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Swofford DL. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-80.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Trisuwan K, Rukachaisirikul V, Sukpondma Y, Preedanon S, Phongpaichit S, Rungjindamai N, et al. Epoxydons and a pyrone from the marine-derived fungus Nigrospora sp. PSU-F5. J Nat Prod 2008;71:1323-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Durairaj S, Srinivasan S, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P. In vitro antibacterial activity and stability of garlic extract at different pH and temperature. EJ Bio 2009;5:5-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Pan F, Liu ZQ, Chen Q, Xu YW, Hou K, Wu W. Endophytic fungus strain 28 isolated from Houttuynia cordata possesses wide-spectrum antifungal activity. Braz J Microbiol 2016;47:480-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Manandhar S, Luitel S, Dahal RK. In vitro antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against human pathogenic bacteria. J Trop Med 2019;2019:1895340:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Handayani D, Ananda N, Artasasta A, Ruslan R, Ffdriyanti O, Tallei TE. Antimicrobial activity screening of endophytic fungi extracts isolated from brown algae Padina sp. J Appl Pharm Sci 2019;9:9-13.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wang L, Ren L, Li C, Gao C, Liu X, Wang M, et al. Effects of endophytic fungi diversity in different coniferous species on the colonization of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae). Sci Rep 2019;9:5077.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bhushan S, Lee WH, Han SK, Sung JM. Observations on some of the mycelial growth and pigmentation characteristics of Cordyceps militatris isolates. Mycobiol 2006;34:83-91.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Du W, Yao Z, Li J, Sun C, Xia J, Wang B, et al. Diversity and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Securinega suffruticosa in the yellow river delta. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229589.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Dos Santos IP, da Silva LC, da Silva MV, de Araújo JM, Cavalcanti Mda S, Lima VL. Antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi from leaves of Indigofera suffruticosa Miller (Fabaceae). Front Microbiol 2015;6:350.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lappa IK, Kizis D, Natskoulis PI, Panagou EZ. Comparative study of growth responses and screening of inter-specific OTA production kinetics by A. carbonarius isolated from grapes. Front Microbiol 2015;6:502.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
   Results and Disc...
  Conclusions
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed380    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded83    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal