|
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2012 | Volume
: 3
| Issue : 3 | Page : 160-170 |
|
|
In vitro-in vivo evaluation of fast-dissolving tablets containing solid dispersion of pioglitazone hydrochloride
Vinay Pandit1, Roopa S Pai1, Kusum Devi2, Sarasija Suresh3
1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, Bangalore 560027, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Continuing Education and Quality Improvement, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, Bangalore 560027, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology (Formulations), NIPER, Mohali, Punjab, India
| Date of Web Publication | 14-Sep-2012 |
Correspondence Address:
Sarasija Suresh
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology (Formulations), NIPER, Mohali, Punjab
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.101008
 Abstract | | |
Investigation of in vitro/in vivo behavior of fast-dissolving tablets containing solid dispersions of pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) is the focus of the present research work. The effect of various hydrophilic polymers on the aqueous solubility of PIO was studied. Poly vinyl pyrrolidine K 30 (PVPK 30) carrier was selected and solid dispersions were prepared by various methods. Evaluation of solid dispersion for percentage yield, drug content, solubility, and Fourier Transform Infrared-indicated kneading method was most appropriate. Furthermore, the dissolution studies exhibited an enhancement in drug dissolution. One-way ANOVA of in vitro data suggested that there was significant (P ≤ 0.05) difference in dissolution profile of PIO solid dispersion when compared with pure drug and commercial product. Infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and powder X-ray diffraction performed on solid dispersion indicated lack of physicochemical interaction between the drug and the carrier. The selected formulation is compressed into fast-dissolving tablets which were further evaluated for tablet properties and in vitro drug release. In vivo studies of pure drug, selected formulation, and marketed product were carried out in male Wistar rats and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Kinetica software 2000. The best formulation has shown T max of 1 hour which was highly significant (P < 0.01) when compared with pure drug and marketed formulation. Therefore, the solid dispersions prepared by kneading method using PVPK 30 as hydrophilic carrier can be successfully used for improvement of dissolution of PIO and resulted in faster onset of action as indicated by in vivo studies. Keywords: Dissolution profile, hydrophilic carriers, kneading method, solubility, solid dispersions
How to cite this article:
Pandit V, Pai RS, Devi K, Suresh S. In vitro-in vivo evaluation of fast-dissolving tablets containing solid dispersion of pioglitazone hydrochloride. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2012;3:160-70 |
How to cite this URL:
Pandit V, Pai RS, Devi K, Suresh S. In vitro-in vivo evaluation of fast-dissolving tablets containing solid dispersion of pioglitazone hydrochloride. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 30];3:160-70. Available from: https://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2012/3/3/160/101008 |
| Introduction | |  |
Pioglitazone, 5-[4-[2-(5-Ethyl-2-pyridinyl) ethoxy] benzyl] thiazolidine-2,4-dione, is a thiazolidinedione derivative with insulin-sensitizing effect that acts as agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor subtype gamma in type II diabetes. Pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) has biological half-life of 4 to 7 hours with excellent oral bioavailability (83%). [1],[2] Although at steady state, the maximum plasma drug concentrations (C max ) were reported as 0.7 (for 15 mg/day dose) and 1.2 mg/l (for 30 mg/day dose), the T max were reported to be 4.8 and 3.7 hours, respectively. This delayed T max may be due to the poor aqueous solubility of PIO (solubility of 0.015 mg/ ml) and may result in the delayed onset of action because of subtherapeutic plasma drug levels; may also lead to therapeutic failure. [3]
Solid dispersions [4],[5] refer to a system in which hydrophobic drug is dispersed in hydrophilic matrix, in order to improve its dissolution properties and bioavailability. In solid dispersion, a drug can exist in an amorphous or crystalline form in hydrophilic polymeric carriers [6],[7] such as polyethylene glycols (PEG), poly vinyl pyrrolidine K 30 (PVPK 30), urea, etc. which results in improved solubility and dissolution rates.
Many patients find it difficult to swallow tablets and hard gelatin capsules and thus do not comply with prescription, which results in high incidence of noncompliance and ineffective therapy. [8] Fast-dissolving tablets also called orodispersible tablets are gaining prominence as new drug-delivery systems. These dosage forms dissolve or disintegrate in the oral cavity within three minutes [9] without the need of water or chewing. Fast-dissolving tablets of loratadine, piroxicam, famotidine, clonazepam, etc. are commercially available. [10]
The objective of the present research work was to formulate solid dispersions of PIO; various hydrophilic carriers were evaluated to determine their effect on solubility of PIO; different methods were then evaluated to select the best method of preparation of solid dispersions. Furthermore, the solid dispersions were formulated into fast-dissolving tablets and effect of formulation on the T max of PIO was studied.
| Materials and Methods | | |
Materials
PIO was a gift sample from Aurobindo Pharma, (Hyderabad, India). PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 20,000 (PEG 20 K), and PVP K30 were provided by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd (Hyderabad, India). Urea, citric acid, and mannitol were procured from Himedia, New Delhi. All other reagents and solvents used were of analytical grade.
Methods
Solubility studies of pure pioglitazone in distilled water and buffers
Solubility studies were carried out by Higuchi and Connors method. [11] An excess amount of pioglitazone was added to distilled water, pH 1.2 and pH 7.4 buffers, respectively, in different screw-capped bottles. The bottles were placed in holder and shaken at room temperature (26 ± 2°C) in water bath shaker for 24 hours. The samples were filtered through membrane filter (0.22 μm). The filtrate was diluted suitably and analyzed using UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Pharmaspec-1700 UV- visible spectrophotometer) at 270 nm.
Screening of appropriate carrier for pioglitazone solid dispersion
The physical mixtures (PMs) of pure drug and different water-soluble polymers viz., mannitol, citric acid, urea, PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 20 K, and PVP K30 in the ratio 1 : 1 were subjected for solubility studies, in distilled water by the method described above. Based on the results obtained, PEG 20 K and PVP K30 were chosen as carriers for solid dispersion.
Preparation of solid dispersions
Solid dispersions were prepared by three different methods viz., kneading, hot-melt, and microwave method. The drug to carrier ratio is shown in [Table 1]. | Table 1: Effect of the method and drug to polymer ratio on % yield, drug content, and solubility of solid dispersions
Click here to view |
Kneading method
The drug and carrier were gently mixed to get uniform mixture. [12] Water : methanol in the ratio of 1 : 1 was added in small quantity to make a paste. The paste was allowed to stand for 45 minutes and dried in hot air oven at 40 ± 2°C. The product obtained was pulverized and passed through mesh (#) 85.
Hot-melt method
The carrier was melted in a china dish and the drug was dispersed in it to get molten mixture which was constantly stirred. The dispersion was cooled. [13] The product obtained was dried at room temperature and was passed through mesh (#) 85.
Microwave method
Initially, the drug and carrier were gently mixed to get uniform mixture. Fixed amount of this mixture was subjected to microwave at the power of 800-1500 W in a domestic microwave oven (Samsung M1739N) at a precise place for optimized duration of 2 minutes. [14] The products were kept at room temperature, pulverized, and passed through mesh (#) 85. The various positions viz., corner, center, and off center inside the oven were optimized by keeping the time constant at 2 minutes.
The prepared formulations were evaluated for % yield, drug content, solubility analysis, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) studies in order to select the appropriate method of preparation. Based on the above studies, the formulation F4, F10, and F16 were selected for further studies.
Evaluation of Solid Dispersions
Percentage yield
Yield was calculated with respect to dry product. Based on the practical yield (P.Y) obtained and the calculated theoretical yield (T.Y), % yield was calculated by using the following formula:
Drug content
Solid dispersion equivalent to 15 mg of PIO was taken and dissolved in 100-ml volumetric flask in 0.2M HCl. Absorbance was measured at 270 nm in triplicate.
Solubility Studies of Solid Dispersions
An excess [11] of pure PIO and prepared solid dispersions were added to screw-capped bottles containing distilled water. Bottles were shaken mechanically at 26 ± 2°C for 24 hours and aliquots were withdrawn, filtered (0.22 μm), and assayed for drug content at 270 nm spectrophotometrically.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
FTIR spectra were recorded by potassium bromide (KBr) disc method using Shimazdu FTIR-8700 spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). The scanning range was 400 to 4 000/cm and the resolution was 4/cm.
Powder X-ray Diffractometry
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns for pure PIO, PM, and selected formulations were recorded on a Rigaku Geigerflex diffractometer using Ni-filtered, CuKα radiation, a voltage of 40 kV, and a 25-mA current.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis was performed using Perkin-Elmer series 7 DSC on 2 to 8 mg samples (Sartorius BP 210 S Germany) of pure PIO, PM, and selected formulations. Samples were heated in an open aluminum pan at a rate of 10°C/min in a 0 to 250°C temperature range under a nitrogen flow of 40 ml/min as purging gas.
In vitro Release Studies
The in vitro dissolution for the selected solid dispersions (equivalent to 15 mg of PIO) was carried out by using USP type II apparatus (Paddle method). The dissolution medium used was distilled water (900 ml), maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C with rotational speed of 75 rpm. At an interval of 15 minutes, samples were withdrawn and filtered through filter paper (0.22 μm) and were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 270 nm after appropriate dilutions, against a similarly treated blank.
Similarly, the pure drug (15 mg) and PM were subjected for in vitro drug release studies and the release profile was compared with selected formulations.
Mathematical Analysis of in vitro Data
The data obtained from in vitro release studies were analyzed by curve fitting method to various models viz., Zero, First order kinetics, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas model, using PCP disso v2.08 software. Dissolution efficiency (DE) [15],[16] is the area under the dissolution curve up to a certain time 't' expressed as percentage of area of the rectangle described by 100% dissolution in the same time [Table 2].
Mean dissolution time (MDT) was calculated by using the equation [17]
MDT= (n / n +1). k- 1/ n
Where, n = release exponent and k = release rate constant.
The dissolution data of pure PIO, PM, selected formulations, and Marketed formulation (MF) were further statistically analyzed by one way ANOVA technique (Graphpad Instat software; demo version) where P ≤ 0.05 considered being significant.
Preparation of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride Tablets
The solid dispersion having the maximum solubility and dissolution rate was selected for preparation of fast-dissolving tablets prepared according to the formula [Table 3]. Formulation F4, the solid dispersion prepared by kneading method, was selected and 15 mg PIO equivalent was incorporated into each tablet. All the ingredients were passed through mesh # 80, mixed thoroughly to get uniform mixture and compressed on a ten station tablet punching machine (Cadmach, India) equipped with flat-faced 6-mm punches. The tablet weight was adjusted to ~100 mg.
Evaluation of the Prepared Tablets
The tablet thickness was determined by using Vernier caliper, while the tablet hardness and friability was determined using Monsanto tablet hardness tester and friabilator (Roche), respectively. The disintegration time was measured by using tablet disintegrator (Electrolab, India). Wetting time was determined by well-reported method. A tissue paper was folded double and placed in a Petri dish More Details (internal diameter 10 cm) containing 10 ml of Amaranth solution. The tablet was carefully placed on the surface of tissue paper. The time required for the tablet to get colored completely pink was noted as wetting time.
In vitro Release Studies of Pioglitazone Tablets
The release rate of fast-dissolving tablets containing pure PIO (T1), solid dispersion of PIO (T4), and MF (containing equivalent of 15 mg of PIO) (n = 6) was determined using USP type II apparatus (Paddle method). The dissolution test was performed using 900 ml of simulated gastric fluid, at 37 ± 0.5°C and 75 rpm. At an interval of 15 minutes, samples were withdrawn and filtered through filter paper (0.22 μm). The samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 270 nm against similarly treated blank.
In order to evaluate the similarity between the best formulation and MF, the in vitro dissolution profiles of both were compared. Similarity factor (f2) was calculated [18] by using the following formula:
In vivo Studies
The bioavailability studies for tablets with pure PIO (T1), solid dispersion of PIO (T4), and MF (Pioglit R ) were carried out using male Wistar rats (200-250 g). The animals were maintained in a clean room at a temperature between 20 - 25°C with 12-hour light and dark cycles and controlled relative humidity. The animals were fasted for 12 hours prior to commencement of the study as well as during the study and had access to water ad libitum. The institutional animal ethical clearance (vide letter no. AACP/IAEC/P-46/2007) was obtained before conducting the studies. They were divided into four groups (six in each group); group I served as a control group whereas other three groups were treated with tablet formulation containing pure drug PIO (T1), MF, and tablet formulation containing solid dispersion of PIO (T4), respectively. Tablets with a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight of rats were administered by dispersing in distilled water through oral feeding pipe. [19]
Blood samples were collected through the lateral tail vein [20] of rats at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes followed by 3, 8, 12, and 24 hours after administration. The blood samples were centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 10 minutes. After centrifugation, plasma was transferred into clean, fresh Eppendorf tubes and frozen at −20°C until assayed. The plasma concentration of drug was determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) [21] (Shimadzu LC 10 AT VP pumps; SPD-10 A detector), using Merck C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column and 0.05M potassium dihydrogen phosphate and methanol (35:65) as mobile phase at 258 nm.
The results obtained were analyzed for various non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters using Kinetica 2000 software. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic data were analyzed statistically [22] by one way ANOVA followed by Dunett Post Hoc test for multiple comparison using graph pad prism (demo version).
In vitro-in vivo correlation
In Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) of drugs, PIO was placed in Class II drug, i.e., drugs having high permeability and low solubility. Level A correlation is the highest category of correlation and represents a point-to-point relationship between in vitro dissolution rate and in vivo input rate of the drug from the dosage form. [22],[23] In vitro-in vivo correlation of tablets with solid dispersion of PIO (T4) was investigated by plotting the percent drug dissolved (Fr) vs percent drug absorbed (Fa). Percent dissolved values were taken from in vitro release data and percent absorbed was determined by the Wagner-Nelson [24] method using the following equation:
Where, F a is the fraction of drug absorbed, C t is the drug plasma concentration at time t, k e is the overall elimination rate constant, AUC 0-t , and AUC0-α are areas under the curve between time zero and time t and between time zero and infinity, respectively.
Stability Studies
Stability studies [25] were performed with T1 and T4 as per ICH guidelines for 6 months at 40°C ± 2°C / 75% RH ± 5%. Samples were withdrawn at regular intervals and evaluated for change in in vitro drug release pattern, hardness, and disintegration time.
| Results | | |
Solubility Studies of Pure Pioglitazone Hydrochloride
The solubility of pure PIO in water, pH 1.2 and pH 7.4, was found to be 0.013 ± 0.002 mg/ml, 0.020 ± 0.002 mg/ml, and 0.018 ± 0.001 mg/ml, respectively.
Screening of Carriers
[Figure 1] illustrates that citric acid, urea, PEG 20 K, and PVP K30 enhances the solubility of pure PIO significantly. The solid dispersions of citric acid and urea were unstable; therefore, PEG 20 K and PVP K30 were selected as carrier for preparation of solid dispersions of PIO. | Figure 1: Effect of carriers on the solubility of pure pioglitazone hydrochloride
Click here to view |
Preparation and Evaluation of Solid Dispersions
Solid dispersions were prepared by three different methods viz., Kneading method, hot-melt method, and microwave method using PEG 20 K and PVP K 30. The solid dispersions obtained by kneading method were free flowing in nature, whereas the solid dispersions prepared by hot-melt method and microwave method were sticky in nature. Percentage yield and percentage drug content of solid dispersion are presented in [Table 1]. The maximum percentage yield (89.16 ± 0.002% to 94.38 ± 0.005%) and drug content (>98%) was observed in case of kneading method. The drug content was significantly decreased in hot-melt method (51.89 ± 0.001 to 78.63 ± 0.002%). Pure PIO spectra showed sharp characteristic peaks at 3406.9 due to N-H stretching, 2927.7, 2633.4, and 2361.7 due to Aliphatic C-H stretching. All the above characteristic peaks appear in the spectra of PM and the solid dispersion formulations (F 4 and F 16 prepared by kneading and microwave technique) indicating no interaction between the drug and carrier.
The FTIR of F 10 (data not shown) has showed absence of the characteristic peaks indicating the possible degradation of drug. Solubility studies of solid dispersion prepared by kneading method and microwave method showed significant increase in the solubility of PIO. From the above results, we concluded that hot-melt method was not suitable for preparing solid dispersion of PIO. Solid dispersions with PVP K30 prepared by both kneading (F 4 ) and microwave (F 16 ) method showed enhanced solubility of 0.386 ± 0.003 mg/ml and 0.365 ± 0.002 mg/ml, respectively. FTIR spectra of PIO, PM, and its solid dispersions F 4 and F 16 are presented in [Figure 2]. | Figure 2: FTIR spectra of pure drug, PVP K 30, physical mixture, and solid dispersions of Pioglitazone hydrochloride (F4 and F16)
Click here to view |
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
The thermal curves of PIO and of selected SDs along with PM are shown in [Figure 3]. The thermal curve of pure PIO exhibited an initial flat profile followed by a sharp endothermic effect, with a T peak at 200.3°C indicative of its anhydrous crystalline state. The DSC profile of PVP K30 was typical of amorphous substances, showing a large dehydration band in the 50°-100°C temperature range. The thermal curve of the PM was practically the sum of those of pure components, showing endothermic effect due to polymer dehydration followed by sharp endothermic peak at 200°C corresponding to the melting point of the drug. There was disappearance of the peak in the solid dispersion formulation indicating the change in crystalline nature of PIO in solid dispersion. | Figure 3: DSC curves for pure drug, PVP K 30, physical mixture, and solid dispersions of Pioglitazone hydrochloride (F4 and F16)
Click here to view |
Powder X-ray Diffractometry
In PXRD, sharper diffraction peaks indicate more crystalline material. The sharp, intense representative peaks of pure PIO, notably at (2θ) 9, 13, 17.5, 19, 20, and 23 were observed. This series of sharp and intense diffraction peaks indicated the crystalline state of pure PIO. The powdered PVP K30 was amorphous in nature as there were few peaks with very weak intensities. The diffraction pattern of the PM was simply the superimposition of those of the pure components. In case of solid dispersions (F 4 and F 16 ), there was reduction in the intensities of the drug peaks indicating the formation of amorphous compound [Figure 4]. | Figure 4: PXRD pattern of pure pioglitazone hydrochloride, PVP K 30, physical mixture (PM), and selected solid dispersion formulations, i.e., F4 and F16
Click here to view |
Dissolution Rate Studies
The dissolution profiles of pure PIO, solid dispersions along with PM in simulated gastric fluid, are shown in [Figure 5]. PIO has shown release of 48.56 ± 2.01% after 4 hours reflecting its low solubility. The dissolution from the PM showed improved drug release profile of 62.25 ± 2.79%, whereas in the solid dispersions, 101.1 ± 1.38% and 93.25 ± 2.08% for F 4 and F 16 formulations, respectively, were observed. The DE was calculated and is summarized in [Table 2]. | Figure 5: Drug release profile of pioglitazone hydrochloride, physical mixture, and solid dispersion formulations, i.e., F4 and F16
Click here to view |
Mathematical Analysis of in vitro Data
The release data of pure drug (PIO), PM, and selected solid dispersions (F 4 and F 16 ) were examined according to the Zero-order, First-order, and Higuchi's, Hixson Crowell, and Korsmeyer-Peppas model using PCP Disso v2.08 software. It was observed that the Hixson Crowell was most suitable mathematical model for describing experimental data for solid dispersions [Table 2].
Preparation and Evaluation Pioglitazone Hydrochloride Tablets
Based on the DE and drug release profile, the solid dispersion F 4 was selected for the formulation of fast-dissolving tablets. The fast-dissolving tablets of PIO were prepared by direct compression [Table 3]. The average weight of the prepared tablets was in range of 97.56 and 102.81 mg and thickness was found to be 2.45 ± 0.01 mm to 2.47 ± 0.05 mm. The hardness of prepared tablets was between 3.1 to 3.3 kg/ cm 2 . The friability of all the formulations was less than 1% indicating the ability of tablet to withstand abrasion in handling packaging and shipment. The wetting time of formulations, water absorption ratio, and weight variation are indicated in [Table 4]. The disintegration time of the tablets containing solid dispersion varied from 40 ± 2.0 to 90 ± 3.0 seconds. The in vitro drug release from tablet containing solid dispersion of PIO (T4) was 93.52 ± 3.05% and drug release of tablet containing pure PIO (T1) showed drug release of 42.12 ± 2.14%, whereas MFs released 45.23 ± 1.0% of drug within 60 minutes [Table 4]. The similarity factor f2 method can be used to compare two dissolution profiles. Similarity factor analysis between the prepared tablet containing solid dispersion of PIO (T4) and the marketed tablet (Pioglitβ ) for the release of PIO showed an f2 factor <50 which confirms that the release of PIO from the prepared tablets was not similar to that of the marketed tablet. The release profile is shown in [Figure 6]. | Figure 6: Comparison of drug release profile of fast-dissolving tablets (T1 and T4) with marketed formulation (MF)
Click here to view |
In Vivo Studies
The plasma drug level curve for the formulation T1 containing PIO, T4 containing solid dispersion of PIO, and marketed product is shown in [Figure 7]. The various pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Kinetica 2000 software, and results are shown in [Table 5]. | Figure 7: Plasma drug level curve for tablet containing pure Pioglitazone hydrochloride (T1), solid dispersion (T4), and marketed formulation (MF) in Wistar rat
Click here to view |
In vitro-in vivo Correlation
An in vitro-in vivo correlation was carried out using the Wagner-Nelson method. [23] Fraction of drug dissolved (Fr) when plotted against fraction of drug absorbed (Fa) gives a good linear regression y = 1.013x + 2.426 [Figure 8]. The correlation coefficient R of 0.993 indicates a good correlation. | Figure 8: In vitro-in vivo correlation of fast dissolving tablets of PIO
Click here to view |
Stability Studies
Stability studies was performed on T1 and T4 as per ICH guidelines for 6 months at 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% using. Studies indicated no significant changes in in vitro drug release pattern, hardness, and disintegration time (P < 0.05).
| Discussion | | |
PIO is poorly soluble in water with poor dissolution profile and belongs to class II of BCS. The solubility studies in buffers have shown increased solubility when compared with distilled water.
Screening of Carriers
Preliminary solubility analysis was carried out to screen the most appropriate carriers where in mannitol, citric acid, urea, PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 20 K, and PVP K30 were used. Solubility in citric acid, urea, and PEG 20000 and PVP K 30 was found to be maximum when compared with other carriers [Figure 1]. Thus, these carriers were selected for the preparation of the solid dispersion. In preliminary studies, it was found that solid dispersions of citric acid and urea were not stable. Therefore, PEG 20 K and PVPK 30 were selected as carriers for preparation of solid dispersion.
Preparation and Evaluation of Solid Dispersions
Solid dispersions were prepared by kneading, hot-melt, and microwave method, with chosen carriers in three different drugs to carrier ratio as shown in [Table 1]. There was no significant effect on solubility observed when the carrier concentration was increased. It was observed that the solubility of PIO was augmented as the concentration of hydrophilic polymer increased from 1: 0.5, below this ratio there was no significant increase in the solubility indicating concentration-independent solubility of PIO above a particular ratio.{Table 1}
The hot-melt method resulted in solid dispersion with low drug content of 41.56 ± 0.002 to 85.13 ± 0.001%. This may be due to degradation of drug in molten carrier. This was further supported by FTIR studies which indicated that there was no characteristic peak of PIO in the solid dispersion prepared by hot melt method [Data not shown].
From the above results, we concluded that hot-melt method was not suitable for preparing solid dispersion of PIO. Moreover, the physical observation of solid dispersion prepared by both kneading and microwave method indicated that solid dispersions of PEG 20 K are sticky in nature, while the PVP K30 formulations were free flowing in nature; therefore, it was concluded that PVP K30 was the most suitable polymeric carrier. Solid dispersions with PVP K30 prepared by both kneading (F 4 ) and microwave (F 16 ) method showed an increase of 30 fold in the solubility of PIO [Table 1].
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
The IR spectrum of pure PIO revealed the presence of a peak at 3 084/cm due to N-H stretching while peaks at 2 927 and 2 740/cm corresponds to CH stretching. Strong absorption peaks was observed at 1 742 and 1 691/cm that are assigned to drug carbonyl stretching vibration (C = O). A peak at 1 614/cm indicates the aromatic ring and a peak at 1 244/cm is due to C-O-Ar group. All these characteristic peaks appeared in the spectra of PM and solid dispersions indicating no interaction of drug with hydrophilic carrier.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
The DSC curve of PIO profiles a sharp endothermic peak (T peak = 200.3°C) corresponding to its melting, indicating its crystalline nature. In contrast, a broad dehydration band over the temperature range 50 to 100°C shown by PVP K30 was typical of amorphous hydrated substance. [26] The characteristic endothermic peak, corresponding to drug melting, was shifted or disappeared in both PMs as well as solid dispersions (F4 and F16) revealing amorphorization of the drug. [27] The data depict that there was no interaction between the components of binary system.
X-ray Powder Diffractometry
All the principal peaks from pure pioglitazone were present in their PM and solid dispersion with lower intensity. The positions of diffraction peaks of pure PIO is present with very low intensity indicating decreased crystallinity which may contribute to enhanced dissolution of drug. No new peaks could be observed, suggesting the absence of interaction between the drug and the carrier.
Dissolution Rate Studies
Dissolution profiles of PIO, PM, and solid dispersions, i.e., F 4 and F 16 are presented in [Figure 5]. The DE at 15 minutes (DE 15), 30 minutes (DE 30), and 180 minutes (DE 180) for PIO, PM, and selected solid dispersions are presented in [Table 2]. The values given in [Table 3] indicate that F 4 (DE180 = 80.40%) shows maximum enhancement in dissolution rate. However, F 16 also produces comparable results in terms of DE (DE180 = 76.24%). PM also improves dissolution rate to a significant extent as compared with pure drug alone. The order of efficiencies of products based on DE values was F4 >F16 > PM >PIO. | Table 2: Curve fitting of selected solid dispersions along with dissolution efficiency of pioglitazone hydrochloride
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: Composition of fast dissolving tablets of pioglitazone hydrochloride
Click here to view |
MDT value was in the range of 37.02 ± 2.5 to 94.46 ± 1.89 minutes. MDT is used to characterize drug release rate from a dosage form. It was observed that in case of solid dispersions, i.e., F 4 and F 16 , the value was much lesser (37.02 ± 2.50 minutes and 42.48 ± 1.52 minutes) when compared with pure drug and MF (94.46 ± 1.89 minutes and 90.70 ± 2.09 minutes), indicating fast dissolution of drug carrier system of solid dispersions. The unpaired one tail t- test has showed very significant difference in MDT of pure drug and solid dispersion formulations (P < 0.001).
The curve fitting of dissolution profile of F 4 and F 16 showed Hixson Crowell model as best fit model with n value of 0.5177 and 0.5971, respectively, indicating anomalous (non-Fickian) diffusion (0.45 < n < 0.89). [28],[29]
The similarity factor (f2) was calculated for dissolution profile between F 4 (kneading method) vs F 16 (microwave method). It was found that the value of f2 was 66.79 indicating similarity between two dissolution profiles. Furthermore, the dissolution profiles of formulation F 4 vs MF was subjected for similarity profile that indicated dissimilar profile as the f2 value is 12.26. This enhancement of dissolution of PIO from solid dispersion may be due to several factors. Presence of amorphous nature, increased wettability and dispersibility, and particle size reduction are the important factors for dissolution rate enhancement. Enhanced dissolution in case of PM can be attributed to higher wettability and dispersibility. During dissolution studies, the solid dispersion settled down immediately while the pure drug was floating on surface of the medium for a long time. Moreover, other factors such as absence of aggregation and/or re-agglomeration phenomenon during dissolution and particle size reduction could be attributed to the better dissolution profile. [30],[31]
Preparation of Pioglitazone Tablets
Based on the in vitro release profile and DE, the solid dispersion F 4 was selected for formulation of fast-dissolving tablets. The fast-dissolving tablets of PIO was prepared by direct compression technique [Table 3]. Various superdisintegrants including Sodium starch glycolate (SSG), crosspovidone, croscarmellose, and Pharmaburst® were screened alone and in combination (results not shown). Finally, SSG and Pharmaburst were chosen and overall superdisintegrant concentration was optimized between 5-10%. The average weight of the prepared tablets was in range of 97.56 and 102.81 mg and thickness was found to be 2.45 ± 0.01 mm to 2.47 ± 0.05 mm. The hardness of prepared tablets was between 3.1 to 3.3 kg/ cm 2 . The friability of all the formulations was less than 1%, indicating the ability of tablet to withstand abrasion in handling, packaging, and shipment. The wetting time of formulations, water absorption ratio, and weight variation is indicated in [Table 4].
It was observed that the wetting time, water absorption ratio, and disintegration time for tablet formulation containing PIO (T1) and MF was significantly different from the tablet formulations containing solid dispersion of PIO (T2-T8) as shown in [Table 4]. This rapid disintegration of tablets was due to the presence of the pores resulting in faster penetration of medium leading to swelling and wicking of superdisintegrants, creating hydrodynamic pressure inside the tablets for quick and complete disintegration of the tablet. [32],[33]
The tablet (T4) containing superdisintegrants in the ratio of 1 : 0.5 (SSG and Pharmaburst) disintegrated faster than tablets prepared with other ratios (1 : 0.25, 1 : 0.75, and 1 : 1). The in vitro drug release from tablet containing solid dispersion of PIO (T4) was 93.52 ± 3.05% and drug release of tablet containing pure PIO (T1) showed drug release of 42.12 ± 2.14%, whereas MFs released 45.23 ± 1.0% of drug within 60 minutes [Table 4].
The in vitro release profile of T1, T4, and MF was statistically analyzed by one way ANOVA which indicated a significant difference (P ?≤ 0.05) in dissolution rate profile of formulation T4 when compared with T1 and MF. The drug release profiles of T1, T4, and MF are shown in [Figure 6].
In vivo Studies
The bioavailability studies for tablets containing pure drug (T1), solid dispersion (T4), and MF were carried out using Wistar rats [Figure 7]. The various pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Kinetica 2000 software; results are shown in [Table 5]. | Table 5: Pharmacokinetics of fast-dissolving tablets of pioglitazone hydrochloride
Click here to view |
Pharmacokinetic profile of T1, T4, and MF was compared by one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett Post Hoc multiple comparison test. Though there was no significant difference in C max (10.04 ± 0.97 μg/ml, 13.69 ± 1.31 μg/ml, and 10.00 ± 0.96 μg/ml) of the formulations, a significant difference (P < 0.01) in T max values (3.0 hours for T1 and MF and 0.833 hour for T4) was observed. The decrease in T max values indicates faster absorption of the drug from T4 formulation. This would be particularly beneficial when pioglitazone tablets are administered at bed time after food.
In vitro-in vivo Correlation
Level A correlation gives direct relationship between in vivo data such that measurement of in vitro dissolution rate alone is sufficient to determine the biopharmaceutical rate of the dosage form. In vitro data when superimposed on to the in vivo data have shown good correlation coefficient (R = 0.993) as shown in [Figure 8].
Stability Studies
The stability studies indicated that there was no significant change observed for in vitro dissolution studies after three months. Fast-dissolving tablets (T4) were found to be stable for the period of six months at 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5%.
| Conclusion | | |
The study showed that the dissolution rate of PIO was enhanced to a greater extent by solid dispersion technique using kneading method and microwave technique. The kneading method was much simpler and industrially feasible and thus can be adopted in order to enhance the dissolution profile of PIO. PVP K30 showed most prominent results indicating the usage of this carrier for solid dispersion of PIO. Furthermore, the fast-dissolving tablets of PIO were successfully prepared by using SSG and Pharmaburst as superdisintegrants. The in vivo studies clearly indicated that solid dispersion approach can be adopted for formulation of PIO tablets in order to achieve a faster onset of action.
| Acknowledgment | | |
Authors are thankful to Prof. B G Shivanada for providing the support and facilities throughout the studies. Furthermore, authors are thankful to All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi, India, for funding the project under Research Promotional Scheme and to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, for funding the project under research grants.
| References | | |
| 1. | Waugh J, Keating GM, Plosker GL, Easthope S, Robinson DM. Pioglitazone - a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2006;66:85-109. 
[PUBMED] |
| 2. | Reginato MJ, Lazar MA. Mechanisms by which Thiazolidinediones enhance insulin action. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1999;10:9-13.
[PUBMED] |
| 3. | Elbary A, Kassem M, Mona S, Samra M, Khalil R. Formulation and hypoglycemic activity of pioglitazone-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Drug Discov Ther 2008;2:94-7.
|
| 4. | Dhirendra K, Lewis S, Udupa N, Atin K. Solid dispersions: A review. Pak J Pharm Sci 2009;22:234-46.
[PUBMED] |
| 5. | Chiou WL, Rielman S. Pharmaceutical application of solid dispersion system. J Pharm Sci 1971;60:1281-302.
|
| 6. | Fahr A, Liu X. Drug delivery strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2007;4:403-16.
[PUBMED] |
| 7. | Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersion. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000;50:47-60.
[PUBMED] |
| 8. | Seager H. Drug-deliver products and the zydis fast-dissolving dosage form. J Pharm Pharmacol 1998;50:375-82.
[PUBMED] |
| 9. | Velmurugan S, Sundar V. Oral disintegrating tablets: An overview. IJCPS 2010;1:1-12.
|
| 10. | Fu Y, Yang S, Jeong SH, Kimura S, Park K. Orally fast disintegrating tablets: Developments, technologies, taste-masking and clinical studies. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2004;21:433-75.
[PUBMED] |
| 11. | Higuchi T, Connors KA. Phase-solubility techniques. Adv Anal Chem Instrrum 1965;4:117-22.
|
| 12. | Modi A, Tayade P. Enhancement of dissolution profile by solid dispersion (Kneading) technique. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:68.
[PUBMED] |
| 13. | Natalija Z, Ales O, Marjan B, Stane S. Physical properties and dissolution behaviour of nifedipine/mannitol solid dispersions prepared by hot melt method. Int J Pharm 2005;291:51-8.
|
| 14. | Moneghini M, Bellich B, Baxa P, Princivalle F. Microwave generated solid dispersions containing Ibuprofen. Int J Pharm 2008;361:125-30.
[PUBMED] |
| 15. | Nokhodchi A, Hassan-Zadeh D, Monajjem-Zadeh F, Taghi-Zadeh N. Effect of various surfactants and their concentration on controlled release of captopril from polymeric matrices. Acta Pharm 2008;58:151-62.
[PUBMED] |
| 16. | Tapas AR, Kawtikwar PS, Sakarkar DM. Enhanced dissolution rate of felodipine using spherical agglomeration with Inutec SP1 by quasi emulsion solvent diffusion method. Res Pharm Sci 2009;4: 77-84.
[PUBMED] |
| 17. | Patil SA, Kuchekar BS, Chabukswar AR, Jagdale SC. Formulation and evaluation of extended-release solid dispersion of metformin hydrochloride. J Young Pharm 2010;2:121-9.
|
| 18. | Avachat A, Kotwal V. Design and evaluation of matrix-based controlled release tablets of diclofenac sodium and chondroitin sulphate. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:E1-6.
[PUBMED] |
| 19. | Ikeda T, Fujiyama K. The effect of pioglitazone on glucose metabolism and insulin uptake in the perfused liver and hindquarter of high-fructose-fed rats. Metabolism 1998;47:1152-5.
[PUBMED] |
| 20. | Parasuraman S, Raveendran R, Kesavan R. Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010;1:87- 93.
[PUBMED]  |
| 21. | Lakshmi KS, Rajesh T, Sharma S. Determination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in pharmaceutical formulations and rat plasma by RP-LC. Int J PharmTech Res 2009;1:496-99.
|
| 22. | Pandit V, Pai RS, Yadav V, Devi K, Surekha BB, Inamdar MN, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of floating microspheres of metformin hydrochloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2012;Early Online:1-11.
|
| 23. | Chen JC, Chiu MH, Nie RL, Cordell GA, Qius SX. Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: Structures and biological activities. Nat Prod Rep 2005;22:386-99.
|
| 24. | Wagner JG, Nelson E. Kinetic analysis of blood levels and urinary excretion in the absorptive phase after single doses of drug. J Pharm Sci 1964;53:1392-403.
[PUBMED] |
| 25. | Mathews BR. Regulatory aspects of stability testing in Europe. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:831-56.
|
| 26. | Zerrouk N, Mennini N, Francesca M, Chemtob C, Mura P. Comparison of the effect of chitosan and polyvinylpyrrolidone on dissolution properties and analgesic effect of naproxen. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;57:93-9.
|
| 27. | Abdelkader H, Abdallah OY, Salem HS. Comparison of the effect of tromethamine and polyvinylpyrrolidone on dissolution properties and analgesic effect of nimesulide. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:65.
[PUBMED] |
| 28. | Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 1983;15:25-35.
|
| 29. | Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv 1985;60:110-1.
[PUBMED] |
| 30. | Ford JL. The current status of solid dispersions. Pharm Acta Helv 1986;61:69-88.
[PUBMED] |
| 31. | Craig QM. The mechanism of drug release from solid dispersions in water soluble polymers. Int J Pharm 2002;231:131-44.
|
| 32. | El-Arini SK, Clas SD. Evaluation of disintegration testing of different fast dissolving tablets using the texture analyzer. Pharm Dev Technol 2002;7:361-71.
[PUBMED] |
| 33. | Karavas E, Georgorakis E, Sigalas MP, Avgoustakis K. Investigation of the release mechanism of a sparingly water soluble drug from solid dispersion in hydrophilic carriers based on physical state of drug, particle size distribution and drug-polymer interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;44:1111-30.
|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Accelerated diabetic wound healing by topical application of combination oral antidiabetic agents-loaded nanofibrous scaffolds: An in vitro and in vivo evaluation study |
|
| Muhammet Emin Cam,Busra Ertas,Hussain Alenezi,Ayse Nur Hazar-Yavuz,Sumeyye Cesur,Gul Sinemcan Ozcan,Ceyda Ekentok,Ece Guler,Christina Katsakouli,Zehra Demirbas,Dilek Akakin,Mehmet Sayip Eroglu,Levent Kabasakal,Oguzhan Gunduz,Mohan Edirisinghe | | Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021; 119: 111586 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Studies on the pH-dependent solubility of various grades of calcium phosphate-based pharmaceutical excipients |
|
| Michael Wagner, Tobias Hess, Daniel Zakowiecki | | Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Soluplus® based solid dispersion as fast disintegrating tablets: a combined experimental approach for enhancing the dissolution and antiulcer efficacy of famotidine |
|
| Mona Basha,Abeer Salama,Shereen H. Noshi | | Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2020; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Evaluation of burst release and sustained release of pioglitazone-loaded fibrous mats on diabetic wound healing: an
in vitro
and
in vivo
comparison study |
|
| Muhammet Emin Cam,Sila Yildiz,Hussain Alenezi,Sumeyye Cesur,Gul Sinemcan Ozcan,Gokce Erdemir,Ursula Edirisinghe,Dilek Akakin,Durdane Serap Kuruca,Levent Kabasakal,Oguzhan Gunduz,Mohan Edirisinghe | | Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2020; 17(162): 20190712 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Most promising solid dispersion technique of oral dispersible tablet |
|
| Vikrant K. Nikam,Shubham K. Shete,Jyoti P. Khapare | | Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2020; 9(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Calcium Phosphate Incorporated Bacterial Cellulose-Polyvinylpyrrolidone Based Hydrogel Scaffold: Structural Property and Cell Viability Study for Bone Regeneration Application |
|
| Probal Basu,Nabanita Saha,Radostina Alexandrova,Petr Saha | | Polymers. 2019; 11(11): 1821 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Formulation of Pioglitazone-Eudragit® RS100 Nanobeads and Nanofibers Using Electrospraying Technique |
|
| Patrick Khosro Adibkia,Mohammad Barzegar-Jalali,Niloofar Balaei,Karim Osouli-Bostanabad,Solmaz Ghajar,Shahram Emami,Solmaz Zakhireh | | Polymer Science, Series A. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Comparison of solvent–wetted and kneaded l-sulpiride–loaded solid dispersions: Powder characterization and in vivo evaluation |
|
| Dong Shik Kim,Jong Seo Choi,Dong Wuk Kim,Kyeong Soo Kim,Youn Gee Seo,Kwan Hyung Cho,Jong Oh Kim,Chul Soon Yong,Yu Seok Youn,Soo-Jeong Lim,Sung Giu Jin,Han-Gon Choi | | International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2016; 511(1): 351 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
