|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 221-228
Development, characterization and solubility study of solid dispersions of azithromycin dihydrate by solvent evaporation method
SC Arora1, PK Sharma2, Raghuveer Irchhaiya3, Anurag Khatkar1, Neeraj Singh1, Jagbir Gagoria1
1 R.K.S.D. College of Pharmacy, Kaithal, Haryana, India
2 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, MIST, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Institute of Pharmacy, Bundelkand University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||08-Apr-2010|
|Date of Decision||01-Jun-2010|
|Date of Acceptance||07-Jun-2010|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Nov-2010|
S C Arora
R.K.S.D. College of Pharmacy, Kaithal, Haryana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Azithromycin Dihydrate (Poorly water soluble drug), when prepared as solid dispersion showed improved solubility and dissolution. So the main purpose of this investigation was to increase the solubility and dissolution rate of Azithromycin Dihydrate by the preparation of its solid dispersion with urea using solvent evaporation method. Physical mixtures and solid dispersions of Azithromycin Dihydrate were prepared by using urea as water-soluble carrier in various proportions (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, 1:7 by weight), by employing solvent evaporation method. The drug release profile was studied and it was found that the dissolution rate and the dissolution parameters of the drug from the physical mixture as well as solid dispersion were higher than those of the intact drug. FT- IR spectra revealed no chemical incompatibility between drug and urea. Drug-polymer interactions were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD).
Keywords: Azithromycin Dihydrate; Urea; Solvent Evaporation Method; Solid dispersion
|How to cite this article:|
Arora S C, Sharma P K, Irchhaiya R, Khatkar A, Singh N, Gagoria J. Development, characterization and solubility study of solid dispersions of azithromycin dihydrate by solvent evaporation method. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2010;1:221-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Arora S C, Sharma P K, Irchhaiya R, Khatkar A, Singh N, Gagoria J. Development, characterization and solubility study of solid dispersions of azithromycin dihydrate by solvent evaporation method. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2010 [cited 2022 May 18];1:221-8. Available from: https://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2010/1/2/221/72262
| Introduction|| |
Azithromycin Dihydrate ((2R, 3 S, 4 R, 5 R, 8 R, 10 R, 11 R, 12 S, 13 S, 14 R)13-[(2, 6-di deoxy-3-C methyl-3-Omethyl-a-L-ribo-hexopyranosyl) oxy]-2ethyl-3, 4, 10-trihydroxy-3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14-heptamethyl-11-[ [3, 4, 6, - trideoxy-3(dimethylamino)-β-D-xylohexopyranosyl]oxy]-1-oxa-6 azacyclopentadecan-15-one) [Figure 1] a macrolide antibiotic of the azalide subclass, exerts its antibacterial action by binding to the 50s ribosomal subunits of susceptible bacteria and suppressing protein synthesis; however, it differs chemically from erythromycin in that a methyl-substituted nitrogen atom is incorporated into the lactone ring. Azithromycin, as the dihydrate, is a white crystalline powder with a molecular formula of C 38 H 72 N 2 O 12•2H 2 O and a molecular weight of 785.0. It is used orally for the treatment of bronchitis, certain types of skin infections, sore throat (pharyngitis, tonsillitis), and pneumonia. One of the major problems with this drug is its very poor solubility in biological fluids that results into poor bioavailability after oral administration. It shows erratic dissolution problem in gastric and intestinal fluid due to its poor water solubility. Rate of absorption and/or extent of bioavailability for such insoluble drugs are controlled by rate of dissolution in gastrointestinal fluids . The peak plasma concentration (C max ) and the time taken to reach C max (t max ) depend upon extent and rate of dissolution of drug respectively. The effort to improve the dissolution and solubility of a poorly water-soluble drug remains one of the most challenging tasks in drug development. Several methods have been introduced to overcome this problem like solid dispersions, complexation, Zydis technology, and by the use of hydrophilic carriers.
Solid dispersion, which was introduced in the early 1970's , refers to a group of solid products consisting of at least two different components, generally a hydrophilic matrix and a hydrophobic drug. The matrix can be either crystalline or amorphous. The drug can be dispersed molecularly, in amorphous particles (clusters) or in crystalline particles . Solid dispersion technique has been used for a wide variety of poorly soluble drugs such as nimesulide , ketoprofen , tenoxicam , nifedipine , nimodipine , ursodeoxycholic acid , and albendazole  Various hydrophilic carriers, such as polyethylene glycols , polyvinylpyrrolidone , hydroxypropyl methylcellu lose , gums , sugar , mannitol , and urea , have been investigated for improvement of dissolution characteristics and bioavailability of poorly aqueous soluble drugs.
Solid dispersion can be prepared by various methods such as solvent evaporation and melting method. Solid dispersion technique has been extensively used to increase the solubility of a poorly water-soluble drug. According to this method, a drug is thoroughly dispersed in a water-soluble carrier by suitable method of preparation. The mechanism by which the solubility and the dissolution rate of the drug are increased includes: reduction of the particle size of drug to submicron size or to molecular size in the case where solid solution is obtained. The particle size reduction generally increases the rate of dissolution; secondly, the drug is changed from amorphous to crystalline form, the high energetic state which is highly soluble; finally, the wettability of the drug particle is improved by the hydrophilic carrier. Azithromycin Dihydrate-urea systems, prepared by solvent evaporation method, showed an improvement in dissolution rates of the drug from the solid dispersions as compared with the pure drug and physical mixtures. This study presents formulation of solid dispersions of Azithromycin Dihydrate with urea as the hydrophilic carrier.
| Materials And Methods|| |
Azithromycin Dihydrate was obtained as generous gift from FDC Limited, Mumbai. Urea (Analytical grade) was purchased from Qualikems Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade.
Preparation of Physical Mixture
Accurately weighed amount of Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea (carrier) in various drug-to-carrier weight ratios were thoroughly blended in glass mortar for 5 min. The composition of various batches is shown in [Table 1]. The products were kept in for further study.
|Table 1: Composition of Batches Containing Azithromycin Dihydrate and Urea|
Click here to view
Preparation of Solid Dispersion
The solid dispersions of Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea (carrier) in various drug-to-carrier weight ratios were prepared by solvent evaporation method. The 100 mg of Azithromycin Dihydrate was dissolved in 20 ml of methanol in a beaker and carrier was added and mixed to dissolve at 40°C on a hot plate to get a clear solution. Then the solvent was allowed to evaporate. The process of evaporation was opted until the constant weight was obtained. Solid Dispersions prepared were crushed, pulverized and sifted through mesh number 80 and stored in desiccators.
Estimation of Azithromycin Dihydrate
Azithromycin Dihydrate was estimated at 215 nm  using UV spectrophotometer (Systronics Double Beam Spectrophotometer 2202). Standard curve for the estimation was prepared in phosphate buffer pH 6.0 in concentration range of 2-30 ΅g/ml. In this concentration range good linearity was observed with the correlation coefficient (R2) 0.9939. The graph obeyed the Beer-Lambert's law in the selected concentration range.
Characterization of Samples
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
All prepared solid dispersions were subjected to FTIR spectroscopic studies to determine drug-carrier interaction. FTIR spectra were recorded on samples prepared in potassium bromide (KBr) disks using Fourier Transform IF spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, RXI FTIR System). Samples were prepared in KBr disks by means of a hydrostatic press. The scanning range was 400 to 4000 cm -1 and resolution was 2 cm -1 .
Differential scanning calorimetric studies
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out on a scanning calorimeter (DSC Q10 V9.0 Build 275, Universal V4.1D TA Instruments). The instrument was calibrated using indium as standard. Samples (5-10 mg) were placed in sealed aluminium pans and heated from 70°C to 150°C at a rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere (60 ml/min), with empty pan as reference.
X-Ray Diffraction Studies
The powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed by X'pert Pro with Spinner PW3064 using Ni-filtered, CuKa radiation, a voltage of 45 kV, and a current of 40 mA with a scintillation counter. The instrument was operated in the continuous scanning speed of 4°/min over a range of 5°C to 40°C.
Solid dispersions equivalent to 100 mg of Azithromycin Dihydrate were weighed accurately and dissolved in a suitable quantity of phosphate buffer pH 6.0. The solutions were filtered and drug content was determined at 215 nm by UV spectrophotometer (Systronics Double Beam Spectrophotometer 2202) after suitable dilution. The percentage yield of each formulation was also calculated.
To evaluate the increase in solubility of Azithromycin Dihydrate, physical mixture and solid dispersions, saturation solubility measurements were conducted. The known excess (approximately 50 mg) of Azithromycin Dihydrate was added to 100 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Samples were rotated at 20 rpm in a water bath (37.0 ±0.5°C) for 48 hours. The samples were then filtered, suitably diluted, and analyzed by UV spectrophotometer at 215 nm.
The dissolution studies were performed using a US Pharmacopeia XXIV type II dissolution test apparatus. The samples equivalent to 100 mg Azithromycin Dihydrate were placed in a dissolution vessel containing 900 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) maintained at 37.0 ±0.5°C and stirred at 100 rpm. Samples were collected periodically and replaced with a fresh dissolution medium. After filtration, concentration of Azithromycin Dihydrate was determined spectrophotometrically at 215 mn.
| Result and Discussion|| |
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
FT-IR studies were done to detect the possible interactions between the Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea. The characteristic peaks of Azithromycin Dihydrate, urea and physical mixtures are presented in [Table 2]. It was revealed that there were no differences in the positions of the absorption bands, hence providing evidence for the absence of interactions in the solid state between Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea.
|Table 2: FT-IR peaks of pure Azithromycin Dihydrate, urea and physical mixture of Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea.|
Click here to view
Differential Scanning Calorimetric Studies
Differential scanning calorimetry shows sharp endothermic fusion peak at 124.9°C, which is corresponding to the melting point of Azithromycin Dihydrate [Figure 2].
X-Ray Diffraction Studies
The diffraction spectra of Azithromycin Dihydrate and urea show numerous distinct peaks indicating that both are present in a highly crystalline state. The XRD pattern of solid dispersion of sample SD5 exhibits all the characteristic diffraction peaks of urea and crystalline Azithromycin Dihydrate, but of lower intensity. Thus study reveals that some Azit romvcin Dihydrate still exists in the crystallize state in the solid dispersion.
Drug content and saturation solubility
The drug content and saturation solubility were determined and results were presented in [Table 3].
|Table 3: Drug content and saturation solubility of different formulations.|
Click here to view
The dissolution rate of pure Azithromyein Dihydrate was very poor and during 120 min a maximum about 34.22% of the drug was released. The reason for the poor dissolution of pure drug could be poor wettability and/ or agglomeration or particles size. It was found that the dissolution rate of the drug increased according to increasing amount of hydrophilic carrier (urea) in physical mixture batches. This was due to the increase in solubility of chug by the presence of hydrophilic carrier surrounding the drug particles. [Figure 3] shows comparative release profile of various solid dispersions of Azithromycin Dihydrate with urea, physical mixture containing 1:5 ratio of drug: urea and pure drug. From release profile it can be seen that dissolution of Azithromycin Dihydrate in solid dispersions increase with increase in urea up to 1:5 ratio of drug: urea. This increase in the dissolution rate may be due to increase in drug wettability, solubilization of drug by hydrophilic carrier and release of drug at molecular level. From the results, it was concluded that the dissolution rate of Azithromycin Dihydrate increased by preparing solid dispersion with urea.
|Figure 3: Comparative in vitro release profiles of Azithromycin Dihydrate from solid dispersions and physical mixture containing urea.|
Click here to view
| Acknowledgement|| |
Authors would like to thank FDC Limited, Mumbai for the generous gift of Azithromycin Dihydrate.
| References|| |
|1.||l. Reynolds, J.E.F., Eds., In; Martindale; The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 29 th Edn., The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London, 1993, 295. |
|2.||Chiou WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci. 1971; 60: 1281 Y 1302. |
|3.||Babu GV, Kumar NR, Himasankar K, Seshasayana A, Murthy KV. Nimesulide-modified gum karaya solid mixtures: preparation, characterization and formulation development. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2003; 29: 855-864. |
|4.||Rogers JA, Anderson AJ. Physical characteristics and dissolution profiles of ketoprofen-urea solid dispersions. Pharm Acta Hely. 1982;57: 276Y281. |
|5.||El-Gazayerly ON. Characterization and evaluation of tenoxicam coprecipitates. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000; 26: 925Y 930. |
|6.||Vippagunta SR, Maul KA, Tallavajhala S, Grant DJW. Solidstate characterization of nifedipine solid dispersions. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 236:111Y123. |
|7.||Murali Mohan Babu GV, Prasad CHDS, Ramana Murthy Ky. Evaluation of modified gum karaya as carrier for the dissolution enhancement of poorly water soluble drug nimodipine. Int J Pharm. 2002; 234: 1Y17. |
|8.||Okonogi S, Yonemochi E, Oguchi T, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Yamamoto K. Enhanced dissolution of ursodeoxycholic acid from the solid dispersion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997;23: 1115Y1121. |
|9.||Torrado S, Torrado S, Torrado JJ, Cadorniga R. Preparation, dissolution and characterization of albendazole solid dispersions. Int J Pharm. 1996;140:247Y250. |
|10.||Margarit MV, Rodryguez IC, Cerezo A. Physical characteristics and dissolution kinetics of solid dispersions of ketoprofen and polyethylene glycol 6000. Int. J. Pharm. 1994; 108: 101Y107. |
|11.||Yagi N, Terashima Y, Kenmotsu H, Sekikawa H, Takada M. Dissolution behavior of probucol from solid dispersion systems of probucolpolyvinylpyrrolidone. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1996; 44: 241Y244. |
|12.||Kushida I, Ichikawa M, Asakawa N. Improvement of dissolution and oral absorption of ER-34122, a poorly water soluble dual 5-lipoxygenase /cyclooxygenase inhibitor with antiinflammatory activity by preparing solid dispersion. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 91: 258Y266. |
|13.||Danjo K, Nakata T, Otsuka A. Preparation and dissolution behavior of ethenzamide solid dispersions using various sugars as dispersion carriers. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1997; 45:1840Y1844. |
|14.||Arias MJ, Gines JM, Moyano JR, Perez-Martinet JI, Rabasco AM. Influence of preparation method of solid dispersions on dissolution rate: study of triammterene-Dmannitol. System. Int. J. Pharm. 1995; 123: 25Y31. |
|15.||The Indian Pharmacopeia, 2007, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Solid dispersions: Opportunity in drug delivery system
| ||Dhiman, S. and Kaur, P. and Arora, S. |
| ||Drug Invention Today. 2012; 4(10): 478-486 |
||Screening paediatric rectal forms of azithromycin as an alternative to oral or injectable treatment
| ||Kauss, T. and Gaudin, K. and Gaubert, A. and Ba, B. and Tagliaferri, S. and Fawaz, F. and Fabre, J.-L. and Boiron, J.-M. and Lafarge, X. and White, N.J. and Olliaro, P.L. and Millet, P. |
| ||International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012; 436(1-2): 624-630 |